President Donald Trump has strongly refuted a CNN report that questioned the effectiveness of U.S. military strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities. The report suggested that the strikes, part of an operation dubbed “Op Midnight Hammer,” did not achieve their intended objective of significantly damaging Iran’s nuclear capabilities. In response, Trump labeled the report as “FAKE NEWS,” asserting that the targeted sites were “completely destroyed.” This statement was supported by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who dismissed the CNN report as “flat-out wrong.” Leavitt emphasized that the operation was successful and achieved its goals. Further adding to the controversy, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff condemned the intelligence leak that formed the basis of the CNN report, describing it as “treasonous.” Witkoff insisted that the information was inaccurate and potentially harmful to national security interests. The leak has sparked concerns about internal security and the handling of sensitive information within U.S. intelligence agencies. The situation highlights ongoing tensions between media outlets and political figures regarding the dissemination of information related to national security. Trump’s vehement denial and the administration’s unified front suggest a concerted effort to maintain control over the narrative surrounding U.S. military actions abroad. This incident also underscores the challenges faced by intelligence agencies in safeguarding classified information while ensuring transparency and accountability. As debates continue over the accuracy of media reports and government transparency, this development raises important questions about trust in public institutions and the role of journalism in holding power to account. The implications for U.S.-Iran relations are significant, as both nations navigate a complex geopolitical landscape marked by longstanding tensions and strategic maneuvering.