In the ongoing investigation of the Kolkata law college rape case, defense attorney Raju Ganguly has presented a notable argument regarding the physical evidence against his client, Manojit Mishra. Ganguly emphasized that Mishra had no scratch marks on his body, which he argued could undermine the allegations of rape. The only mark found was described as a ‘love bite,’ which Ganguly suggested might indicate a consensual encounter rather than an assault. To further support this claim, Ganguly proposed that the victim’s phone records be thoroughly examined to provide additional context to the events in question. This development comes amid heightened public scrutiny and media coverage, as the case has sparked significant debate over issues of consent and legal procedures in sexual assault cases. In response to the complexities and sensitivities surrounding the case, Kolkata police have decided to transfer the investigation to their detective department. This move aims to ensure a more detailed and impartial inquiry into the allegations. The case continues to draw attention as it unfolds, with many awaiting further evidence and testimonies that could clarify the circumstances of the incident. The outcome of this case may have broader implications for how similar cases are handled in the future, potentially influencing legal standards and public perceptions of justice in sexual assault allegations.