Newly unsealed documents have brought to light a controversial practice employed by the Trump administration, involving the use of a pro-Israel website known as Canary Mission. This website was instrumental in identifying pro-Palestinian academics, with the ultimate aim of potentially revoking their visas. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) formed a specialized team to compile data on foreign students and scholars, focusing on those flagged by Canary Mission. This initiative resulted in over 75 individuals being identified as potential targets for deportation.

**The Role of Canary Mission** Canary Mission is a website that has been known for its pro-Israel stance, often targeting individuals and groups it perceives as anti-Israel. The site compiles detailed profiles of activists, academics, and students who express pro-Palestinian views. These profiles include personal information and allegations of anti-Semitism or support for terrorism, which can have serious repercussions for those listed.

**Involvement of the Trump Administration** The documents reveal that Stephen Miller, a senior aide in the Trump administration, played a significant role in this initiative. Miller was known for his hardline immigration policies and was reportedly heavily involved in the decision-making process regarding the use of Canary Mission’s data. The administration’s approach raised concerns about privacy and the potential misuse of information to target individuals based on their political beliefs.

**Implications for Foreign Students and Scholars** The DHS team focused on foreign students and scholars who were identified by Canary Mission. This practice has sparked significant controversy, as it suggests that individuals could face visa revocation or deportation based solely on their political activities or affiliations. Critics argue that this sets a dangerous precedent, where academic freedom and free speech are threatened by government surveillance and intervention.

**Broader Impact and Reactions** The revelation of this practice has drawn criticism from civil rights organizations and academic institutions. They argue that such actions undermine trust in governmental processes and infringe upon individual rights. The use of external websites like Canary Mission to influence immigration decisions highlights the complex intersection between politics, technology, and civil liberties.