Edlow and Vaughan Challenge OPT Program’s Legality: Uncovering the Debate
- July 19, 2025
- 0
The Optional Practical Training (OPT) program in the United States is a crucial pathway for international students to gain work experience in their field of study. It allows these students to work temporarily in the U.S. after completing their academic programs, providing them with valuable industry exposure and enhancing their career prospects. However, this program is currently under scrutiny by critics who question its legality and impact on the U.S. job market.
Key figures like Vaughan and Edlow have raised significant concerns regarding the OPT program, arguing that it operates without explicit congressional approval. They claim that this lack of legislative backing makes the program illegal and opens doors for potential exploitation of international students. Critics argue that without proper oversight, the program could lead to unfair labor practices, where students might be underpaid or overworked.
The potential termination or severe restriction of the OPT program poses a threat to the pipeline of global talent entering the United States. This is particularly concerning for Indian students, who constitute a significant portion of OPT participants. The program’s limitations could deter talented individuals from pursuing education and careers in the U.S., ultimately affecting America’s position as a leader in technology and innovation.
Restricting or ending the OPT program could have broader implications for the U.S. economy. International students contribute significantly to various sectors, especially technology and engineering. By limiting their ability to work in the U.S., there could be a reduction in skilled labor available to American companies, potentially hindering growth and innovation.