Minister’s Warning on ‘Udaipur Files’

Rajasthan Minister Jogaram Patel has issued a cautionary statement regarding the anticipated release of the film ‘Udaipur Files.’ Speaking at NDTV Rajasthan’s ‘Emerging Business Program-2025’ in Jaipur, Patel highlighted the potential societal impact of the film, which is based on the 2022 murder of Udaipur-based tailor Kanhaiya Lal. The minister criticized the Ashok Gehlot government, under whose tenure the murder occurred, labeling it a failure. He expressed confidence that justice would prevail with strict punishment for the culprits following the trial. However, he noted that the film’s subject remains under judicial consideration, and its release could have significant repercussions.

Judicial Proceedings and Film Release

The release of ‘Udaipur Files’ is currently suspended due to a judicial stay imposed by the Delhi High Court on July 10. The case has escalated to the Supreme Court, where Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi have deferred proceedings to July 21. The court has instructed all parties to await the decision of a central government-appointed panel. The Supreme Court emphasized that while filmmakers might receive monetary compensation for a delayed release, reputational damage to the accused in Kanhaiya Lal’s murder case could not be undone if the film were released prematurely.

Concerns Over Fair Trial

Senior Advocate Menaka Guruswamy, representing accused Mohammad Javed, argued that releasing the film could compromise her client’s right to a fair trial. The court acknowledged this concern, indicating its potential impact on judicial proceedings. Additionally, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Maulana Arshad Madani of Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, who filed a petition against the film, reported that he found significant vilification against a community upon viewing the movie as directed by the High Court.

Filmmakers’ Defense and Certification

Gaurav Bhatia, representing the filmmakers, informed the court that ‘Udaipur Files’ had obtained certification from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), albeit with 55 mandated cuts. Despite this certification, concerns remain about its content and timing relative to ongoing legal matters.

Supreme Court’s Directive

The Supreme Court has directed the central review committee to expedite its evaluation process without delay. This directive underscores the urgency and sensitivity surrounding both the film’s release and its potential implications for ongoing legal proceedings and societal harmony.