Congress Criticizes Modi’s Leadership Amid Operation Sindoor and Security Concerns
- July 27, 2025
- 0
Congress leader Jairam Ramesh has openly criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership, particularly in the context of Operation Sindoor and the recent Pahalgam attack. Ramesh drew a stark contrast between Modi’s approach and that of former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, especially in terms of handling national security issues. The Congress leader emphasized that Vajpayee had established a review committee following the Kargil War, which he believes was crucial for assessing and improving India’s security strategies.
Operation Sindoor has become a focal point of criticism from the Congress party, with Ramesh questioning the government’s handling of security failures. The operation, which was intended to address specific security threats, has been scrutinized for its effectiveness and execution. Ramesh argues that the absence of a comprehensive review process similar to Vajpayee’s post-Kargil initiative reflects a lack of accountability and strategic foresight in Modi’s administration.
Ramesh’s critique extends to a broader comparison of leadership styles between Modi and Vajpayee. He suggests that Vajpayee’s proactive measures in response to the Kargil War set a precedent for thorough evaluation and improvement of national security protocols. In contrast, Ramesh accuses Modi’s government of failing to implement similar measures following recent security incidents, which he believes undermines India’s preparedness against future threats.
The Congress party’s criticism highlights significant concerns about India’s current national security framework under Modi’s leadership. By drawing attention to the lack of a review committee akin to Vajpayee’s, Ramesh underscores the need for systematic evaluation and reform in handling security challenges. This ongoing debate raises questions about the effectiveness of current policies and the potential need for strategic changes to ensure national safety.