Intense Debate in Rajya Sabha Over CISF Presence Claims

A heated exchange unfolded in the Rajya Sabha as Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge accused the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) of being present during opposition protests. This claim sparked a significant debate with Deputy Chairman Harivansh and other members of the treasury benches. Kharge argued that the presence of CISF personnel constituted a violation of democratic rights, suggesting an overreach of authority within the parliamentary premises.

Treasury Benches and Chair Refute Allegations

In response to Kharge’s allegations, Deputy Chairman Harivansh, along with members of the treasury benches, firmly denied the claims. They asserted that no CISF personnel were present during the protests and that only Parliament marshals were involved in maintaining order. This rebuttal aimed to clarify the situation and reassure members about the adherence to parliamentary protocols.

Implications for Democratic Processes

The debate highlights ongoing tensions between opposition parties and the government regarding security measures within Parliament. Kharge’s accusations raise concerns about potential infringements on democratic processes and the autonomy of legislative bodies. The incident underscores the need for transparency and clear communication regarding security protocols in sensitive political environments.

Approval of President’s Rule Extension in Manipur

Amidst the controversy, the Rajya Sabha proceeded to approve an extension of President’s Rule in Manipur. This decision reflects ongoing governance challenges in the region and underscores the central government’s role in maintaining stability. The approval signifies a continued focus on addressing regional issues while navigating complex political dynamics at the national level.