Srikkanth slams Harshit Rana’s ODI inclusion, questions India’s selection logic
- October 5, 2025
- 0
Former India captain and selector Krishnamachari Srikkanth has voiced strong criticism over the inclusion of Harshit Rana in India’s One Day International squad for the upcoming tour of Australia. His remarks have reignited debate around the team’s selection policies, player rotation, and long-term planning for major tournaments.
Srikkanth questioned the reasoning behind constant changes in India’s limited-overs squads, suggesting that frequent reshuffles disrupt team balance and player confidence. He expressed frustration at what he perceives as inconsistent decision-making by selectors, especially when proven performers are left out while relatively inexperienced players are fast-tracked into key series.
A major point of contention raised by Srikkanth was the exclusion of Sanju Samson from the ODI squad. Samson, who has been part of India’s white-ball setup intermittently, was overlooked once again despite solid performances in domestic and franchise cricket. According to Srikkanth, such decisions send mixed signals to players working hard to earn their place in the national side.
Harshit Rana’s selection drew particular scrutiny from Srikkanth, who questioned whether the young pacer had done enough to merit a spot on a challenging overseas tour. He pointed to Rana’s modest showing in recent tournaments such as the Asia Cup and argued that his inclusion appeared premature. The former selector also commented on what he described as “filmy gimmicks” displayed by some younger players, implying that focus should remain firmly on performance rather than theatrics.
Looking ahead, Srikkanth warned that inconsistent selection choices could undermine India’s preparation for future global events like the 2027 World Cup. He emphasized that building a stable core group is essential for long-term success and cautioned against short-term experimentation that might compromise team cohesion. His remarks highlight an ongoing concern among cricket observers about balancing experimentation with stability in international cricket planning.
The discussion around Harshit Rana’s inclusion reflects a broader issue within Indian cricket—how to manage emerging talent while maintaining fairness and clarity in selection criteria. Many former players have echoed similar sentiments over the years, urging selectors to prioritize consistency and merit-based evaluation over impulsive changes driven by short-term form or external pressures.
In conclusion, Krishnamachari Srikkanth’s comments underscore growing unease about India’s current selection approach ahead of major international assignments. His critique serves as a reminder that while nurturing young talent is vital, maintaining transparency and stability remains equally crucial for building a championship-winning side capable of meeting long-term goals on the world stage.