Alabama Judge Halts Execution to Assess Inmate’s Mental Competency
- July 28, 2025
- 0
A significant legal development has occurred in Alabama, where a judge has temporarily halted the execution of David Lee Roberts, a 59-year-old convicted murderer. Roberts was scheduled to be executed on August 21 for the 1992 murder of Annetra Jones. However, Marion County Circuit Judge Talmage Lee Carter issued a stay to allow time for an investigation into Roberts’ mental competency. The judge emphasized the need to determine whether Roberts possesses a “rational understanding” of his impending execution and its implications.
The stay will remain in effect until the Alabama Department of Mental Health completes its evaluation of Roberts. The core issue is whether Roberts’ perception of reality is so impaired that he cannot comprehend the meaning and purpose of his execution or the connection between his crime and its punishment. This decision aligns with a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that prohibits the execution of inmates who are deemed insane and unable to understand their execution or its reasons.
Roberts’ attorneys have argued for the suspension of his death sentence, citing his diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. They contend that his delusions and auditory hallucinations prevent him from having a factual or rational understanding of his situation. Notably, Roberts has exhibited concerning behavior, such as attempting to burn tattoos off his body due to delusional beliefs.
Roberts was set to be executed using nitrogen gas, a method that Alabama began employing last year. This method gained attention when Kenneth Smith was executed in January 2024. The Alabama attorney general’s office has not contested the stay but has requested an expedited competency evaluation.
Roberts was convicted of capital murder for killing Annetra Jones in Marion County on April 22, 1992. Despite a jury recommendation for life imprisonment without parole, a judge overrode this decision and sentenced him to death—a practice no longer permitted in Alabama. This case highlights ongoing debates about mental health considerations in capital punishment and the evolving legal standards surrounding execution competency.