Controversy Over Ball Change at Lord’s Sparks Debate
- July 12, 2025
- 0
The third Test match between England and India at Lord’s witnessed a significant controversy over the decision to change the ball, which former cricketer Ian Ward described as “ridiculous.” The incident occurred during the first session of Day 3, following the drinks break. The umpires’ decision to change the ball after the break, rather than during it, led to an unexpected delay of over seven minutes. This decision has drawn criticism from various quarters, including former Indian cricketer Ravi Shastri.
Ian Ward, speaking on Sky Sports, expressed his frustration over the timing of the ball change. He questioned why the decision wasn’t made at the start of the drinks break, allowing play to resume promptly. Instead, the delay caused by checking multiple replacement balls disrupted the flow of the game. Ward’s comments highlight a broader issue with how such decisions are managed during high-stakes matches.
Ravi Shastri echoed Ward’s sentiments, emphasizing that common sense should have prevailed in this situation. He pointed out the inefficiency of checking five balls, none of which passed through the ring used for testing their suitability. Shastri’s remarks underscore a need for more streamlined procedures to avoid unnecessary interruptions in play.
The controversy wasn’t limited to Day 3. On Day 2, India raised concerns about the condition of the Dukes ball after just 10 overs. The umpires’ attempt to test its shape led to a heated discussion with India’s captain, Shubman Gill. Despite these challenges, England continued with the same ball later in the day when it passed the hoop test.
England’s Joe Root proposed a solution to manage ball changes more effectively. He suggested allowing each team three challenges every 80 overs to request a ball change. Root believes this approach would prevent excessive delays and reduce reliance on manufacturers for consistent ball quality.
The ongoing issues with ball changes at Lord’s highlight a need for clearer guidelines and improved processes in cricket matches. As teams and officials seek solutions, these incidents may prompt changes in how such situations are handled in future games.