(plain text): Authorities in Bareilly have sealed 38 shops located on waqf land, a move that has sparked sharp reactions from local traders and residents. The action came just days after a confrontation between protesters and police, intensifying tensions in the area. While officials maintain the closures are part of an anti-encroachment drive, shopkeepers argue the decision is retaliatory in nature.

Shops Sealed Following Recent Unrest

The district administration confirmed that 38 commercial establishments were vacated and sealed. These shops, many of which were operated by members of the minority community, were situated on land designated as waqf property. Authorities stated that the businesses had been operating without authorization and were therefore subject to removal.

Allegations of Retaliation by Shop Owners

Shopkeepers affected by the closures have voiced strong objections, claiming the move was not about encroachment but rather a punitive response to recent disturbances. They allege that the sealing of their businesses is directly linked to Friday’s unrest, when clashes broke out between demonstrators and law enforcement officers during a protest linked to religious slogans.

District Magistrate Defends Action

The district magistrate rejected claims of reprisal, emphasizing that the sealing drive was part of a broader crackdown on those accused of participating in violent incidents. According to officials, the decision was taken after reviewing records related to encroachments on waqf property, and not as an act of collective punishment against any community or group of traders.

Connection to IMC Chief’s Arrest

The controversy has also drawn attention because of its association with the arrest of the Indian Muslim Council (IMC) chief, who had links to some of the shops now sealed by authorities. His detention earlier added another layer to the ongoing dispute, with critics suggesting that both actions are interconnected efforts aimed at curbing dissent following last week’s unrest.

Impact on Local Economy and Community

For many shop owners, these establishments represented their primary source of income. The sudden closure has left families uncertain about their livelihoods and future prospects. Community leaders have expressed concern over rising mistrust between residents and officials, warning that such measures could deepen divisions if not handled with transparency and fairness. The sealing of 38 shops in Bareilly highlights ongoing tensions between administrative enforcement and community perceptions in sensitive situations. While authorities insist the move was a lawful step against encroachment and rioting, affected traders view it as collective punishment tied to recent clashes. The outcome underscores how administrative actions taken in volatile contexts can have far-reaching social and economic consequences for local communities.