Government Stance on Age of Consent

The Union government has firmly communicated to the Supreme Court that maintaining the age of consent at 18 years is crucial. This decision underscores the government’s commitment to protecting minors from sexual exploitation, particularly in environments where they should feel safe. The Centre’s position reflects a broader strategy to enforce child protection laws rigorously, ensuring that minors are shielded from potential abuse.

Challenges in Lowering the Age of Consent

The proposal to lower the age of consent has been met with significant resistance from the government. The Centre argues that reducing this age could undermine efforts to safeguard children, as many offenses occur within trusted circles. The data suggests that a majority of sexual offenses against minors are perpetrated by individuals known to them, complicating the use of consent as a defense in legal proceedings.

Judicial Discretion in Adolescent Relationships

While advocating for a strict legal framework, the government acknowledges the complexities involved in adolescent romantic relationships. The Centre has indicated that judicial discretion should be exercised in such cases, allowing for a nuanced approach that considers the unique circumstances of each situation. This perspective aims to balance the need for protection with an understanding of adolescent development and relationships.

Implications for Child Protection Laws

The government’s stance has significant implications for child protection laws in India. By upholding 18 as the minimum age of consent, the Centre reinforces its dedication to combating sexual abuse and exploitation. This policy is intended to serve as a deterrent against potential offenders and provide a clear legal standard for protecting minors.