Key Testimony in Dentist’s Murder Trial

The murder trial of Dr. James Craig, a dentist from Aurora, Colorado, has taken a pivotal turn with crucial testimony from Caitlin Romero, the office manager at Sunnybrook Dental Group. Romero’s statements have become central to the case, as she recounted her interactions with Craig during the period he allegedly poisoned his wife, Angela. According to Romero, Craig casually dismissed an initial poisoning attempt by suggesting he might have added “too much protein” to Angela’s shake.

Timeline of Events Leading to Hospital Visits

On March 6, 2023, Craig arrived late at the dental office, explaining that he and his wife had exercised earlier that morning. He mentioned that Angela felt unwell after consuming a post-workout protein shake he prepared. Later that day, Craig took Angela to the emergency room when she reported feeling dizzy and “drugged.” Despite these symptoms, she was released without a diagnosis. Craig’s unusual return to the office after hours raised further suspicions among staff.

Suspicious Package and Internet Searches

Romero testified about receiving a package marked as a biohazard on March 13. The contents included potassium cyanide, which she confirmed by checking the invoice. Her curiosity led her to research cyanide poisoning symptoms online. This discovery coincided with Angela’s deteriorating health and subsequent hospital admissions.

Legal Implications and Defense Strategy

The prosecution argues that Craig’s predictions about his wife’s death indicate premeditation and intent to kill. Legal analyst Kelly Hyman highlighted the significance of these predictions in establishing Craig’s mental state during the alleged crime. The defense has not contested Romero’s statements but may challenge their admissibility and interpretation, suggesting alternative explanations for Angela’s symptoms.

Romero’s Relationship with Craig Under Scrutiny

During cross-examination, defense attorney Lisa Fine Moses explored Romero’s close relationship with Craig, revealing an “intimate emotional relationship” that was not initially disclosed to investigators. This revelation could impact the credibility of her testimony and the overall narrative presented by the prosecution.