A shocking case has emerged involving Constable Deepak Kumar Rout, who admitted to killing his wife, Subhamitra Sahoo, following disputes over a financial loan. The disturbing sequence of events has drawn attention due to the calculated manner in which the crime was carried out and later uncovered by investigators.

Dispute Over Loan Leads to Tragedy

According to police reports, tensions between Rout and his wife escalated after disagreements surrounding a ₹10 lakh loan. The financial strain reportedly became a recurring source of conflict in their relationship, ultimately culminating in a violent confrontation. Investigators revealed that Rout strangled his wife inside his car during one such dispute.

Body Hidden and Transported Across Districts

After committing the crime, Rout kept his wife’s body inside the vehicle for an entire day before deciding how to dispose of it. He then drove approximately 170 kilometers away from their residence to Keonjhar district, where he buried her remains in a secluded area. This deliberate attempt at concealment added another layer of complexity to the investigation.

Unusual Behavior After the Crime

In a chilling detail that has unsettled many, Rout visited a temple soon after burying his wife’s body. Reports indicate he even took selfies during this visit, displaying behavior that contrasted starkly with the gravity of what had just occurred. This unusual conduct later became part of the evidence trail examined by authorities as they pieced together his movements.

Initial Deception and Police Breakthrough

When questioned initially, Rout attempted to mislead investigators by providing false information about his wife’s whereabouts. However, inconsistencies in his statements raised suspicion among officers handling the case. To verify their doubts, police examined WhatsApp conversations between the couple and subjected Rout to a polygraph test. Both measures revealed discrepancies that contradicted his claims and pointed toward foul play.

Confession Following Investigation

Faced with mounting evidence from digital records and lie detection results, Rout eventually confessed to killing Subhamitra Sahoo. His admission confirmed what investigators had begun to suspect through their inquiries into his behavior and communication patterns prior to her disappearance. The confession closed critical gaps in the timeline of events leading up to and following the murder.

The case highlights how financial disputes can escalate into extreme outcomes when left unresolved and underscores the importance of thorough investigative methods in uncovering hidden truths behind criminal acts. By combining digital evidence with psychological testing, authorities were able to expose deception and bring clarity to a case initially clouded by misleading accounts.