Environmental groups often criticize the United States’ reliance on fossil fuels, advocating for a transition to renewable energy sources. However, this shift poses significant challenges to national and economic security. The reliance on coal, oil, and natural gas remains crucial for maintaining the country’s strategic position globally. Critics argue that reducing fossil fuel development could inadvertently empower geopolitical rivals like Russia and China, who continue to exploit these resources aggressively. Greenpeace, a prominent environmental organization, recently faced legal repercussions, being ordered to pay $667 million to the Dakota Access Pipeline developer due to its controversial campaign against the project. This incident highlights the potential consequences of radical environmental activism on U.S. energy policies. The push for renewable energy, while well-intentioned, may undermine the reliability of the U.S. electricity grid and threaten economic stability. Spain’s recent experience with renewable energy serves as a cautionary tale. In April, the country celebrated running entirely on renewable energy, only to face a nationwide blackout later that month. This incident underscores the challenges of relying solely on renewables without adequate infrastructure upgrades, leading to higher electricity costs for consumers. The International Energy Agency reports that increasing renewable energy usage by 10% raises electricity costs by over 4 cents per kilowatt hour. Consequently, countries like Germany face significantly higher electricity rates compared to the United States and China. As China and Russia continue expanding their fossil fuel capabilities, they gain an economic edge over democratic nations. Despite environmental concerns, China remains the world’s largest carbon emitter, with emissions surpassing those of all developed nations combined in 2020. This reality emphasizes the need for the United States to maintain its fossil fuel production to ensure energy security and competitiveness. While environmental activism plays a role in shaping sustainable policies, radical efforts to dismantle fossil fuel development overlook a critical truth: energy security is national security. Abandoning domestic oil and gas production would not reduce global emissions but rather empower polluting regimes that prioritize energy dominance over environmental stewardship. To safeguard both national security and environmental goals, U.S. policymakers must adopt a balanced approach that recognizes the importance of maintaining energy independence while pursuing sustainable practices.