LinkedIn Post Sparks Workplace Ethics Debate

A recent LinkedIn post by Human Resource professional Priyavarshini M has sparked a significant discussion on workplace ethics. The post recounts an incident involving an employee who resigned just one month after joining the company. The timing of the resignation was particularly striking, as the employee’s salary was credited at 10:00 AM, and the resignation email followed promptly at 10:05 AM. This sequence of events led Priyavarshini to question the ethics behind such a move, asking, “Was that fair? Was it ethical?”

Challenging the Decision

In her post, Priyavarshini further challenged the employee’s decision, posing questions about their intentions and actions. She asked why someone would take a job if they never intended to stay, why they would go through the hiring process, and why they would remain silent during onboarding or training. According to her, resigning immediately after payday reflects “a lack of intent, maturity, and accountability,” sending a negative message to both employers and colleagues.

Viral Reaction and Diverse Opinions

The post quickly went viral, garnering over 2,000 reactions and more than 600 comments. The discussion evolved into a broader debate on workplace loyalty and the realities of the job market. Opinions varied widely; some defended employee choices while others highlighted corporate layoffs and questioned employer ethics. The comment section became a battleground of perspectives.

Community Responses Highlight Broader Issues

One user criticized Priyavarshini for sharing such matters on social media, suggesting it showed immaturity. Another user poetically described the decision as a response to perceived darkness in the company’s future. A third user acknowledged that while sudden exits aren’t ideal, they can be necessary for protecting one’s mental health or career. They emphasized that professional ethics should be mutual, with honesty and respect from both employees and employers.