July 25, 2025
Politics

Government Affirms ‘Secular’ and ‘Socialist’ to Stay in Preamble

  • July 25, 2025
  • 0
Government Affirms ‘Secular’ and ‘Socialist’ to Stay in Preamble

Government Reaffirms Commitment to Constitutional Terms

The government has reiterated its commitment to retaining the terms “socialist” and “secular” in the Constitution’s preamble. This announcement comes amid ongoing debates about the relevance of these terms, which were introduced during the Emergency period. Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal confirmed that there is no intention to initiate any legal or constitutional process to remove these words. This clarification aims to dispel any misconceptions regarding potential changes to the preamble.

Contrasting Views from RSS and Political Figures

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has been vocal about its desire to see these terms removed, arguing that they were not part of the original Constitution. The RSS’s stance is supported by former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, who has also expressed a preference for their removal. Despite these calls, the government maintains its position, emphasizing that no formal steps have been taken to alter the preamble.

Historical Context of ‘Socialist’ and ‘Secular’

The terms “socialist” and “secular” were added to the Indian Constitution during the Emergency period in 1976 through the 42nd Amendment. This amendment aimed to emphasize India’s commitment to a secular and socialist framework, aligning with the broader political ideology of that era. The inclusion of these terms has been a subject of debate ever since, with differing opinions on their necessity and impact on Indian governance.

Implications for Indian Politics and Society

The government’s decision to uphold these terms reflects its dedication to maintaining the foundational principles of India’s democratic framework. By retaining “socialist” and “secular,” the government signals its commitment to inclusivity and equality, values that are integral to India’s identity. This decision is likely to influence ongoing political discourse and shape future debates on constitutional amendments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *