Government Scrambles to Address Impeachment Fallout

In the wake of Jagdish Dhankhar’s resignation as Vice President, the government is actively seeking solutions to mitigate the impact of his acceptance of the Opposition’s impeachment notice against Justice Yashwant Varma. This development has intensified the complexities surrounding the impeachment process, which is already intricate. Dhankhar’s decision has further complicated the government’s efforts to manage the situation effectively.

Initial Government Strategy and Challenges

Initially, the government aimed to spearhead the impeachment proceedings by introducing the motion in the Lok Sabha. This approach was intended to demonstrate a firm stance against corruption within the judiciary and align with previous attempts to reform the judges’ appointment system. The government had even prepared a motion for Justice Varma’s removal, securing signatures from Opposition MPs in the Lok Sabha.

High-Level Meetings and Strategic Discussions

Following Dhankhar’s acceptance of the Opposition notice in the Rajya Sabha, a series of high-level meetings were convened within the government. Key figures such as Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, Deputy Chairman of RS Harivansh, and Secretary Generals from both Houses participated in these discussions. The primary focus was on addressing procedural flaws in the Opposition’s notice and determining whether to withdraw or amend it.

Decision to Withdraw and Form a Committee

The government has resolved to withdraw the Opposition’s proposal from the Rajya Sabha. This move allows the Lok Sabha Speaker to recommend forming a three-member committee to investigate allegations against Justice Varma. Additionally, there is consideration that the Deputy Speaker could potentially reverse Dhankhar’s decision.

Implications of Dhankhar’s Resignation

Dhankhar’s unexpected acceptance of the impeachment proposal without consulting the government caught officials off guard. Had they been informed, ruling party MPs would have also endorsed the motion. In response to governmental dissatisfaction, Dhankhar chose to resign. This series of events underscores the delicate balance between political strategy and procedural integrity in handling judicial matters.