India’s defence attache to Indonesia, Captain Shiv Kumar, has sparked a significant discussion by attributing the Indian Air Force’s (IAF) losses during the May 7 strikes in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) to political decisions. According to Captain Kumar, these constraints prevented the IAF from targeting military establishments effectively. This revelation comes in the wake of Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Chauhan’s earlier acknowledgment of initial losses suffered by the IAF. The situation has been further complicated by Pakistan’s claims of having downed six Indian fighter jets during the conflict. However, the Indian government has not yet provided an official account or quantification of these losses. The statement by Captain Kumar has led to a flurry of reactions, with many questioning the impact of political directives on military operations. The government’s response suggests that Captain Kumar’s remarks were taken out of context, emphasizing that strategic decisions are made with careful consideration of various factors, including national security and diplomatic relations. The incident highlights the delicate balance between military objectives and political strategies in conflict situations. This development underscores the complexities involved in military engagements where political considerations can influence operational outcomes. It also raises questions about transparency and communication between military officials and the government. As discussions continue, there is a growing call for clarity on the actual events and decisions that led to the reported losses. The broader implications of this incident may affect future military strategies and political-military relations in India. It serves as a reminder of the intricate interplay between defense policies and political decision-making processes, especially in high-stakes situations involving national security.