India has taken a firm stance against Pakistan at the United Nations Human Rights Council, accusing it of supporting terrorism and undermining global security. During a recent session, Indian representative Kshitij Tyagi did not hold back in his criticism, labeling Pakistan as a “terror sponsor” and highlighting its alleged hypocrisy on the international stage.

Tyagi’s remarks were pointed and direct, drawing attention to Pakistan’s alleged involvement in funding terrorist networks. He emphasized that these networks pose significant threats not only to regional stability but also to global peace. This accusation is not new, as India has consistently raised concerns over Pakistan’s actions in various international forums.

The Indian representative further underscored his point by referencing the Pahalgam attack, a tragic event that has been attributed to groups operating from Pakistani soil. This incident remains a painful memory for many and serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing tensions between the two neighboring countries.

In addition to the Pahalgam attack, Tyagi brought up Pakistan’s past sheltering of Osama bin Laden, the mastermind behind the September 11 attacks in the United States. This reference was intended to highlight what India perceives as Pakistan’s double standards when it comes to combating terrorism.

India’s strong words at the UNHRC are part of a broader strategy to hold Pakistan accountable on an international platform. By calling out what it sees as hypocrisy, India aims to rally global support for more stringent measures against nations that allegedly harbor and support terrorist activities.

The ongoing conflict between India and Pakistan has deep historical roots, with both countries having fought multiple wars since their independence in 1947. The Kashmir region remains a particularly contentious issue, often serving as a flashpoint for military and diplomatic confrontations.

As tensions continue to simmer, India’s latest move at the UNHRC underscores its commitment to addressing what it views as threats to its national security. The international community will be closely watching how these developments unfold and whether they lead to any tangible changes in policy or action from either side.