India has firmly rejected the legitimacy of the Court of Arbitration established under the Indus Waters Treaty, labeling it as unlawful. This decision stems from India’s refusal to acknowledge the court’s authority over disputes concerning the Kishenganga and Ratle hydropower projects. The Indian government argues that the court’s establishment contravenes the provisions of the 1960 treaty, rendering its proceedings and decisions null and void. This stance is part of a broader strategy, as India has decided to suspend the treaty’s implementation until Pakistan halts its cross-border terrorism activities. The Indus Waters Treaty, signed in 1960 between India and Pakistan, was designed to manage water resources shared by both nations. However, ongoing tensions and allegations of terrorism have strained relations, prompting India to question the treaty’s viability under current circumstances. By placing the treaty in abeyance, India aims to pressure Pakistan into addressing security concerns that have long plagued bilateral relations. This development highlights the complex interplay between international agreements and geopolitical tensions, underscoring the challenges in maintaining cooperative frameworks amidst persistent conflicts. The situation remains fluid, with potential implications for regional stability and water resource management in South Asia. Observers are closely monitoring how this dispute might influence future diplomatic engagements between the two countries, as well as its impact on broader regional dynamics.