A social media video by an Indian influencer has triggered widespread criticism after suggesting that people could consider having babies in Canada as a way to obtain permanent residency through humanitarian grounds. The controversial advice, described as a “last option,” has ignited debate among Canadians and immigrants alike about the ethics of exploiting perceived gaps in immigration law.

Viral Video Sparks Immigration Debate

The influencer’s video, which quickly spread across multiple platforms, proposed that couples struggling to secure Canadian permanent residency could consider childbirth in the country as a potential pathway. Although the speaker acknowledged that this approach was not guaranteed to succeed, the suggestion was framed as a possible last resort for those desperate to remain in Canada.

Public Backlash and Ethical Concerns

The remarks have been met with outrage from many Canadians who viewed the advice as manipulative and unethical. Critics argued that such statements undermine the integrity of Canada’s immigration system and portray immigrants unfairly. The backlash intensified amid broader discussions about immigration fairness and national policy enforcement.

Critics Call for Stricter Immigration Oversight

Following the viral clip, several commentators and online users blamed what they perceive as overly lenient immigration policies for creating loopholes that could be exploited. Calls have emerged for stricter regulations, enhanced verification processes, and even deportations for those attempting to misuse humanitarian provisions intended for genuine cases of hardship.

Context of Rising Anti-India Sentiment

The controversy comes at a time when tensions between sections of Canadian society and Indian communities have been heightened by political disagreements and social media narratives. Observers noted that this incident may further strain perceptions, with some warning that such viral content risks reinforcing stereotypes or fueling hostility toward immigrants from India.

The Humanitarian Clause Under Scrutiny

Canada’s humanitarian and compassionate grounds policy allows individuals facing exceptional circumstances to apply for residency on compassionate bases, often involving family or safety concerns. However, experts emphasize that this process is highly selective and not designed as a shortcut to permanent residency. The influencer’s portrayal of it as an alternative route has therefore drawn criticism from both legal professionals and immigration advocates who stress the importance of accurate information when discussing such sensitive topics online.

In conclusion, the uproar surrounding the influencer’s comments highlights ongoing tensions within public discourse on immigration ethics and policy enforcement in Canada. While some view the statement as irresponsible advice that trivializes complex legal processes, others see it as a symptom of frustration among migrants navigating uncertain pathways to settlement. The incident underscores how social media influence can shape — and sometimes distort — conversations around migration, legality, and national identity in an increasingly interconnected world.