A Sudden Departure Raises Questions

Jagdeep Dhankhar’s unexpected resignation as Vice President has stirred significant political discourse. Initially seen as a staunch supporter of the Modi government, Dhankhar’s departure less than three years into his term has led to speculation about underlying tensions. Officially attributed to health concerns, his resignation hints at deeper issues, possibly indicating a breakdown in trust with the government he once fervently supported.

The Growing Rift with the Government

Sources reveal that Dhankhar’s relationship with the government had been deteriorating over the past year. The situation escalated when he refused to align with the government’s stance on the impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma. Despite multiple meetings with ministers urging him to reconsider, Dhankhar remained firm in his decision to support the Opposition-backed motion. This defiance was perceived as a challenge to the government’s authority, leading to increased friction.

Power Struggles and Constitutional Autonomy

Dhankhar’s tenure was marked by his desire for privileges akin to those of the President, which included demands for luxury amenities and staff appointments. His insistence on having the final say in matters further strained relations with the ruling party. The Vice President’s actions were seen as an assertion of constitutional power, but they also highlighted the delicate balance between autonomy and political allegiance.

Clashes in Parliament

Tensions reached a peak during a Rajya Sabha session when Dhankhar allowed Opposition leader Mallikarjun Kharge to speak extensively on a sensitive issue, sidelining BJP leader JP Nadda. This breach of protocol angered many within the ruling party and underscored Dhankhar’s growing independence from party lines.

The Aftermath and Political Implications

Dhankhar’s resignation underscores a broader theme within the Modi government: a preference for predictability in top constitutional roles. His departure serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by those who attempt to assert independence within a politically charged environment. The incident raises questions about the shrinking space for constitutional autonomy and highlights the expectations of loyalty from those appointed to high office.