MPs Demand Justice Varma’s Removal Following Cash Scandal

In a significant political development, more than 200 Members of Parliament have initiated impeachment proceedings against Justice Yashwant Varma. This action follows the discovery of burnt cash at his residence in March, raising serious questions about judicial integrity. The motion, which has garnered support from MPs across various political parties, is grounded in constitutional articles and a comprehensive report that recommends Justice Varma’s removal from office.

Constitutional Grounds and Cross-Party Support

The impeachment motion cites specific constitutional articles that outline the grounds for removing a judge from office. This bipartisan effort underscores the gravity of the allegations and the widespread concern over maintaining the judiciary’s credibility. The MPs involved in this initiative are determined to uphold judicial accountability and ensure that any breach of trust is addressed with due diligence.

Supreme Court’s Stance on Urgent Hearing

Despite the mounting pressure, the Supreme Court has declined to expedite a hearing on a related petition. This decision has sparked debate over the judiciary’s role in self-regulation and its approach to handling allegations against its members. Justice Varma, meanwhile, has consistently denied any wrongdoing, maintaining his innocence amid the controversy.

Implications for Judicial Accountability

The case highlights critical issues surrounding judicial accountability and transparency. As the proceedings unfold, they are likely to set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future. The outcome could have far-reaching implications for the judiciary’s relationship with other branches of government and its public perception.