Nepal’s Gen Z Movement Backs Sushila Karki for Leadership
- September 10, 2025
- 0
Nepal’s Generation Z is at the forefront of a significant protest movement, driven by frustration over rampant corruption and recent restrictions on social media. The movement has rallied behind Sushila Karki, a former Chief Justice known for her impartiality and esteemed civic reputation, as their interim leader. Her selection comes at a time of heightened tensions in Kathmandu, where violent demonstrations and curfews have become commonplace.
The youth of Nepal, particularly those belonging to Generation Z, have taken to the streets in unprecedented numbers. Their grievances are rooted in systemic corruption that has plagued the nation for years, coupled with a controversial ban on social media platforms that many see as an infringement on free speech. This movement has gained momentum rapidly, capturing both national and international attention.
Sushila Karki’s appointment as the interim leader of this movement is seen as a strategic choice. As Nepal’s first female Chief Justice, she has a track record of upholding justice and integrity. Her tenure was marked by significant rulings against corruption, which have earned her widespread respect across various sectors of society. Her leadership is expected to bring credibility and focus to the protesters’ demands.
Despite the strong backing for Karki, the movement faces numerous challenges. The government has imposed curfews in Kathmandu in response to escalating violence during protests. These measures have led to clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement, further complicating efforts to negotiate peacefully. The protesters are calling for transparency and accountability from their leaders, demands that have yet to be fully addressed.
Social media has played a pivotal role in organizing and sustaining the protest movement. However, the government’s decision to ban certain platforms has been met with widespread criticism. Many see this as an attempt to stifle dissent and control the narrative. Despite these restrictions, protesters have found alternative ways to communicate and mobilize support both within Nepal and internationally.
The outcome of these protests could have far-reaching implications for Nepal’s political landscape. If successful, the movement could lead to significant reforms in governance and greater accountability from public officials. However, if negotiations fail or if violence continues to escalate, it could result in further instability. The international community is closely watching these developments, as they could influence regional dynamics in South Asia.