Karnataka minister Priyank Kharge has raised concerns over the Ministry of External Affairs’ (MEA) sudden reversal of its decision regarding his official visit to the United States. Initially, the MEA had denied him clearance, but later issued a No Objection Certificate (NOC), allowing him to proceed with the trip. Kharge questioned the reasons behind the initial denial and the subsequent change in stance, suggesting that the matter became public knowledge might have influenced the decision.

Kharge, who plays a significant role in Karnataka’s government, emphasized the state’s contributions to national initiatives and expressed his dissatisfaction with the lack of transparency from the central government. He highlighted that such decisions impact not only individual officials but also broader state and national interests. The minister’s remarks underscore a call for clarity and accountability from the Union government regarding its decision-making processes.

The incident has sparked discussions about the criteria and considerations involved in granting travel permissions to state officials for international engagements. Kharge’s case brings to light the complexities and potential political implications of such decisions, especially when they involve high-profile visits that could influence international relations or state-level projects.

As Karnataka continues to play a pivotal role in various national programs, Kharge’s situation raises questions about how state and central governments coordinate on international matters. The need for clear communication and consistent policies is evident, as these factors are crucial for maintaining effective governance and fostering cooperative federalism.