Sameer Wankhede files lawsuit against Aryan Khan’s debut project
- September 25, 2025
- 0
Sameer Wankhede has approached the Delhi High Court with a lawsuit targeting Aryan Khan’s directorial debut, *The Ba
According to the lawsuit, Wankhede argues that the upcoming series contains portrayals that are untrue and defamatory in nature. He contends that such depictions not only harm his personal image but also undermine the credibility of agencies tasked with combating drug-related crimes. The case has been filed against both Aryan Khan, who is making his directorial debut with the project, and Red Chillies Entertainment, which is producing the series.
Central to Wankhede’s complaint is the allegation that *The Ba
*ds of Bollywood* presents him in a distorted manner. He maintains that this portrayal amounts to character assassination and could mislead viewers about his professional conduct. By linking his name to dramatized events, he argues that the series risks creating a false public perception that could have long-lasting consequences for his reputation.
In addition to requesting an injunction to prevent the release or streaming of the show, Wankhede has demanded monetary damages totaling Rs 2 crore. This claim for compensation is tied to what he describes as reputational harm caused by the project’s content. The legal filing also seeks a formal declaration from the court recognizing that he has been defamed by the portrayal in question.
The controversy surrounds Aryan Khan’s first venture as a director. The project has drawn significant attention not only because it marks his entry into filmmaking but also due to its provocative title and subject matter. With Red Chillies Entertainment backing the production, expectations around its release were already high before legal challenges emerged. The lawsuit now places additional scrutiny on both Khan’s creative choices and the studio’s role in producing the series.
Beyond personal grievances, Wankhede emphasizes that inaccurate portrayals could erode public trust in anti-drug enforcement bodies. By suggesting misconduct or misrepresentation within such agencies, he argues that projects like this risk undermining confidence in institutions responsible for upholding law and order in sensitive areas such as narcotics control.
The case highlights ongoing tensions between creative expression in entertainment and concerns over defamation or reputational damage faced by individuals depicted on screen. As proceedings continue in court, attention will remain focused on how judicial authorities balance artistic freedom with protection against alleged misrepresentation and harm to reputation. The outcome could set an important precedent for future disputes involving real-life figures portrayed in fictionalized works of film or television.