Economist Sanjeev Sanyal has raised concerns over India’s dependence on the H-1B visa system, arguing that the program ultimately strengthens the United States rather than benefiting India. His remarks came in response to a proposed $100,000 fee hike for H-1B visas announced by Donald Trump, which has sparked debate about the future of skilled migration and its impact on India’s workforce.

H-1B Visas and Their Impact

The H-1B visa program allows skilled professionals from countries like India to work in the United States, particularly in technology and engineering fields. While it has long been seen as a pathway for Indian talent to gain global exposure, Sanyal emphasized that the arrangement disproportionately benefits American companies by giving them access to highly trained workers at competitive costs.

Why America Gains More Than India

According to Sanyal, the system enhances U.S. technological strength while simultaneously reducing India’s leverage in global negotiations. By sending large numbers of skilled professionals abroad, India inadvertently contributes to strengthening foreign economies rather than building its own domestic capabilities. This imbalance, he argued, leaves India with fewer advantages when negotiating on international platforms.

Reaction to Visa Fee Hike

Sanyal’s comments were prompted by Trump’s proposal to raise H-1B visa fees significantly—by as much as $100,000 per application. While such a move could make it more expensive for companies to hire foreign workers, Sanyal suggested that India should not focus its energy on lobbying against these changes. Instead, he urged policymakers and industry leaders to view this as an opportunity to rethink strategies for retaining talent within the country.

The Case for Domestic Reforms

Rather than relying on external markets for opportunities, Sanyal stressed that India must prioritize reforms at home. This includes improving education systems, investing in skill development programs, and creating an environment where talented professionals can thrive without feeling compelled to move abroad. By fostering innovation and entrepreneurship domestically, he argued that India can reduce its dependence on foreign visa programs and build long-term economic resilience.

Encouraging Returning Talent

Another key point raised by Sanyal was the importance of attracting back Indian professionals who have gained experience overseas. He suggested that policies should be designed not only to retain talent but also to welcome back those who can contribute valuable international expertise. Such an approach would allow India to benefit from global exposure while ensuring that its workforce remains rooted in national growth priorities.

In conclusion, Sanjeev Sanyal’s perspective highlights a critical shift in how India should approach the issue of skilled migration. While the H-1B visa has provided opportunities for many individuals, he believes the real advantage lies with host nations like the United States. For India to secure long-term benefits, he advocates focusing on reskilling initiatives, structural reforms, and strategies that encourage talent retention and return. His remarks serve as a reminder that sustainable growth depends less on external concessions and more on strengthening domestic foundations.