Sonia Gandhi has expressed strong criticism of the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) money laundering case concerning the National Herald, describing it as “truly a strange case.” Her legal representative, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, presented arguments in court emphasizing the lack of substantive evidence, particularly pointing out the absence of any property involved in the allegations. The ED has accused Sonia and Rahul Gandhi of laundering money through a fraudulent acquisition of assets belonging to Associated Journals Ltd. This case has drawn significant attention due to its implications for the political landscape in India, involving high-profile figures from one of the country’s major political parties. The Gandhis have consistently denied any wrongdoing, asserting that the charges are politically motivated. The case revolves around the alleged misuse of funds and assets, which the ED claims were part of a scheme to gain control over valuable properties. Singhvi’s defense focused on dismantling these claims by highlighting procedural inconsistencies and a lack of concrete evidence. The ongoing legal battle underscores the complex intersection of politics and law in India, with potential ramifications for both the individuals involved and their party’s future. As the case progresses, it continues to be a focal point in discussions about legal accountability and political influence in India.