Supreme Court’s Directive on Stray Dogs

The Supreme Court has issued a directive to civic bodies in Delhi-NCR to relocate stray dogs from residential areas to shelters, igniting a heated debate. While some view the order as necessary for public safety, citing incidents of stray dog attacks, animal rights advocates criticize it as inhumane. The court’s decision raises significant questions about its feasibility and implementation.

Challenges in Implementing the Order

Relocating an estimated 10 lakh stray dogs poses logistical challenges. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) currently operates only 20 animal control centers, insufficient for housing the vast stray population. Constructing new shelters requires substantial funding, land allocation, and time. Additionally, the MCD faces manpower shortages and resistance from local communities and animal lovers.

Current Stray Dog Statistics

According to a 2009 census, Delhi had approximately 5.6 lakh stray dogs. Estimates suggest this number has nearly doubled over the years. Despite efforts to sterilize and vaccinate over 65,000 dogs between January and June this year, the stray population continues to grow.

Public Safety Concerns

Delhi has reported 26,000 dog bite cases this year, with 49 rabies cases recorded by July 31. The Supreme Court emphasizes that its ruling aims to protect public interest by making streets free of stray dogs.

Opposition from Animal Rights Groups

Animal rights organizations argue that relocating dogs is impractical and ineffective. Peta India warns that forced displacement could lead to territorial conflicts and starvation among dogs. They advocate for a robust sterilization program as a more humane and effective solution.