President Donald Trump has launched a verbal attack on Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, accusing him of being overly dependent on American government subsidies. Trump suggested that without these financial supports, Musk might have to return to his native South Africa. This comment comes amid a broader debate over the role of government assistance in the electric vehicle industry. Trump has been vocal about his opposition to the current EV mandate, which he believes is detrimental to traditional automotive industries and jobs in the United States. Meanwhile, Musk has expressed his discontent with Trump’s recent spending bill, which he argues could have negative implications for innovation and economic growth. In response to these political tensions, Musk has even hinted at the possibility of forming a new political party, underscoring his dissatisfaction with the current political landscape. This clash between Trump and Musk highlights their differing perspectives on government intervention in business and the future direction of U.S. politics. The situation underscores a growing divide between those who support government incentives for green technologies and those who advocate for less regulation and more market-driven solutions. As this dispute unfolds, it raises important questions about the balance between fostering innovation and maintaining economic stability in a rapidly changing global market.