U.S. President Donald Trump has once again claimed that he played a crucial role in mediating tensions between India and Pakistan, suggesting that his intervention was pivotal in preventing a potential conflict. According to Trump, he utilized trade negotiations as leverage to de-escalate the situation, asserting that he made phone calls to both nations to facilitate peace. This statement has sparked a strong reaction from India’s Congress party, which has been vocal in its criticism of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s handling of the situation.

Congress leader Pawan Khera has accused Prime Minister Modi of possibly compromising India’s national interests for the sake of receiving praise from Trump. Khera’s remarks highlight concerns within the Congress party about Modi’s diplomatic strategies and the implications of Trump’s claims on India’s foreign policy. The Congress party’s criticism underscores a broader political debate in India regarding the government’s approach to international relations and its interactions with global leaders.

Trump’s assertion of using trade deals as a tool for mediation raises questions about the dynamics of international diplomacy and the role of economic leverage in conflict resolution. The president’s comments have reignited discussions about the effectiveness and ethics of such strategies, particularly in sensitive geopolitical contexts like the India-Pakistan relationship.

The ongoing discourse reflects the complexities of diplomatic engagements and the challenges faced by national leaders in balancing domestic interests with international pressures. As these discussions continue, they may influence public perception and political narratives surrounding India’s foreign policy decisions and its leadership on the global stage.