Trump’s Call for Reform in Environmental Agencies
In a recent “Morning Glory” column, the focus was on the challenges faced by farmers, ranchers, and landowners due to the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), with its 9,000 bureaucrats, has been highlighted as a major contributor to these issues. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other agencies like the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency also play roles in complicating property rights through extensive regulations.
Impact of ESA on Property Rights
The ESA’s application has led to significant restrictions on land use, affecting infrastructure and housing projects nationwide. President Trump is urged to issue executive orders to alleviate these burdens. One proposed order would remove species listed based on “projected decline” in habitat, a criterion criticized for being speculative rather than scientific.
Compensation for Landowners
Another suggested executive order would ensure that landowners affected by ESA listings receive fair compensation, recognizing the financial impact of these regulations as a form of government “taking.” This aligns with constitutional protections against uncompensated property seizures.
Restructuring Environmental Agencies
The column also advocates for downsizing USFWS and NOAA, emphasizing merit-based staffing to eliminate activist influence. This restructuring aims to enhance efficiency and focus on genuinely endangered species while respecting private property rights.
The Role of Legal Advocacy
Organizations like the Pacific Legal Foundation are commended for defending landowner rights. The column suggests incorporating their expertise into agency leadership to balance environmental protection with economic growth.