Climate activist Sonam Wangchuk’s arrest has sparked a heartfelt appeal from his wife, Gitanjali Angmo, who has written directly to President Droupadi Murmu seeking his unconditional release. Wangchuk was detained under the National Security Act (NSA) and transferred to Jodhpur following accusations of inciting unrest during demonstrations in Ladakh that called for statehood and inclusion under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution.

Wife’s Emotional Plea to the President

In her letter, Angmo expressed deep concern over her husband’s detention, revealing that she has not been able to speak with him since his arrest. She urged President Murmu to intervene and ensure his immediate release, describing the situation as unjust and damaging not only to Wangchuk but also to the democratic rights of those advocating peacefully for Ladakh’s future.

Allegations of a “Witch Hunt”

Angmo has characterized her husband’s arrest as part of a larger “witch hunt” against him due to his outspoken advocacy for Ladakh’s rights. She argued that Wangchuk’s activism has always been rooted in non-violence and constructive dialogue, making the charges of incitement particularly troubling. According to her, targeting him under stringent laws like the NSA undermines democratic values and discourages peaceful civic engagement.

The Context of Ladakh Protests

The protests in Ladakh have centered on two major demands: recognition of statehood and protection under the Sixth Schedule provisions, which are designed to safeguard tribal communities through greater autonomy in governance and resource management. Demonstrators have argued that these measures are essential for preserving Ladakh’s unique cultural identity and fragile ecological balance. It was during these demonstrations that authorities accused Wangchuk of encouraging unrest, leading to his detention.

Transfer Under the National Security Act

Following his arrest, Wangchuk was moved from Ladakh to Jodhpur under provisions of the National Security Act. The NSA allows authorities to detain individuals without trial for extended periods if they are deemed a threat to public order or national security. Critics often argue that its use against activists raises questions about proportionality and civil liberties, especially when applied in cases involving peaceful protest movements.

A Call for Democratic Safeguards

Angmo’s appeal highlights broader concerns about how dissent is handled in democratic societies. By framing her husband’s detention as an attack on legitimate activism rather than a matter of law and order, she has drawn attention to the balance between national security measures and citizens’ right to protest peacefully. Her letter seeks not only her husband’s release but also reassurance that advocacy for regional rights will not be criminalized.

The case has become emblematic of tensions surrounding Ladakh’s political future and how voices calling for constitutional safeguards are treated by authorities. As Angmo presses her appeal before the highest office in India, it underscores the ongoing debate over civil liberties, environmental activism, and regional autonomy within the country.