Maryland’s Sole GOP Congressman Warns Redistricting Could Sever White House Ties
- August 8, 2025
- 0
Maryland’s only Republican representative in Congress, Rep. Andy Harris, has raised concerns about potential redistricting efforts that could sever the state’s connection to the White House. As the sole GOP member in Maryland’s congressional delegation, Harris serves as a crucial link between the state and both the executive and legislative branches. He warns that if Democrats proceed with plans to redraw district lines, Maryland could lose this vital bipartisan representation.
Maryland is not alone in facing redistricting challenges. Across the United States, states are embroiled in a contentious battle over congressional maps. Texas Republicans are pushing for changes that could secure up to five additional seats for the GOP in the House of Representatives. In response, Democratic strongholds like California and New York have threatened to bypass independent redistricting commissions to protect their interests.
Maryland Governor Wes Moore’s office has expressed a commitment to evaluating all options as states navigate redistricting decisions. The governor criticized Texas’ actions as a “power grab” and emphasized the importance of bipartisanship. Rep. Harris echoed these sentiments, noting that previous attempts at single-party delegations have failed in court and may do so again.
The redistricting debate extends beyond Maryland, affecting states with imbalanced congressional representation. Harris pointed to Alabama’s recent court-approved map, which added a second Democrat-leaning district following a legal battle over voting rights violations. This case highlights the broader implications of redistricting on minority representation and political balance.
Despite his reservations about mid-cycle redistricting, Harris supports President Donald Trump’s proposal for a snap census excluding undocumented immigrants. He argues that such a measure could reduce Democratic representation in the House by 10 to 15 seats, underscoring the complex interplay between census data and political power.